CMMC Practice SI.L1-3.14.4 – Update Malicious Code Protection: Update malicious code protection mechanisms when new releases are available.
Links to Publicly Available Resources
AMTSO is the Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization, a community of over 60 security and testing companies from around the world. This link from Microsoft identifies reputable security companies that provide consumer security software that is compatible with Windows. This policy template is meant to supplement the CIS Controls v8. The policy statements included within this document can be used by all CIS Implementation Groups (IGs) but are specifically geared toward Safeguards in Implementation Group 1 (IG1). This Ransomware Guide includes ransomware prevention best practices and a ransomware response checklist. This on demand course from CISA can assist in training users on how to ensure devices have antivirus and anti-malware protection. This guide from CISA is designed to provides high level information about protecting against malicious code. This document provides self-assessment guidance for conducting Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) assessments for Level 1. NIST resource that defines the requirements for malicious code protection. This NIST Special Publication provides recommendations for improving an organization’s malware incident prevention measures. This sample policy from Norfolk State University is an example of how to establish a policy and procedure for protection from malicious code. This guide from proofpoint provides information on what to do before, during and after a ransomware attack. I also provides comprehensive guidance on how to break the attack chain and stop ransomware attacks This sample policy from Sam Houston State University is an example of a policy to reduce risk by protecting against malware. This SANS whitepaper discusses several common practices which, when implemented together, will greatly decrease, and perhaps almost stop malware. The official Ubuntu website provides open source and proprietary antivirus options that support Ubuntu and other flavors of Linux.
Discussion [NIST SP 800-171 R2]
Malicious code protection mechanisms include anti-virus signature definitions and reputation-based technologies. A variety of technologies and methods exist to limit or eliminate the effects of malicious code. Pervasive configuration management and comprehensive software integrity controls may be effective in preventing execution of unauthorized code. In addition to commercial off-the-shelf software, malicious code may also be present in custom-built software. This could include logic bombs, back doors, and other types of cyber-attacks that could affect organizational missions/business functions. Traditional malicious code protection mechanisms cannot always detect such code. In these situations, organizations rely instead on other safeguards including secure coding practices, configuration management and control, trusted procurement processes, and monitoring practices to help ensure that software does not perform functions other than the functions intended.
Further Discussion
Malware changes on an hourly or daily basis, and it is important to update detection and protection mechanisms frequently to maintain the effectiveness of the protection.